SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Mad) 81

BALAKRISHNA AYYAR
In re, Sambandam – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.S. Kailasam, for Petitioners.

Judgement

ORDER :- The petitioners, nine in number, were called upon by the Joint Magistrate of Negapattinam to show cause why they should not be directed to furnish security under S. 107, Cr. P.C. for keeping the peace for a period of six months.

2. In response to the notice issued to them, the petitioners appeared before the learned Magistrate and submitted that one of the instances which had been referred to in the preliminary order under S. 112, Cr. P.C. formed the subject- matter of P.R.C. No. 3 of 1955 on the file of the Sub-Magistrate of Negapattinam and prayed for an adjournment of the security case till the disposal of P.R.C. No. 3 of 1955. This request for an adjournment was refused.

Thereupon, the first petitioner filed an application under S. 526(8), Criminal P.C. intimating the learned Magistrate that he intended to move this Court for the transfer of the case from his file and asking for an adjournment on that ground. Accordingly the Joint Magistrate adjourned the case to 14-3-1955. Immediately thereafter the Sub-Inspector of Police presented a report to the learned Magistrate praying that, in the circumstances set out in it, interim security may be taken from the petiti











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top