SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Mad) 221

RAJAMANNAR, PANCHAPAKESA AYYAR
Rallis India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
E. V. Manickam, Chetti and Co. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Narasimchariar and N. Varadarajan, for Appellants; G.N. Chary, for Respondents.

Judgement

RAJAMANNAR, C.J. :- The parties to this appeal entered into three contracts in respect of purchase and sale of groundnut expeller oil cake each of which contract contained a clause that in the event of any dispute arising out of the said contracts including the construction or fulfilment of the same, such disputes shall be settled by arbitration by and under the rules of the Madras Chamber of Commerce.

Disputes did arise between the parties and the arbitration clause was invoked. The Madras Chamber of Commerce thereupon entered on their duties as arbitrators. The arbitration was entrusted to one of their members. The hearing appears to have been posted to 9-3-1953, when the respondents counsel was absent and a request was made for adjournment on that ground. The arbitrator finding that the time for submission of the award was fast approaching wanted to know from the parties whether they would agree for an extension of time.

Eventually the appellant before us agreed to such extension, but not the respondents. Thereupon, the arbitrator went on with the proceeding without the respondents and passed an award. This award was set aside on an application made by the respondents by














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top