SOMASUNDARAM
In re Ponnu Kudumban – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
ORDER :- This is a petition to quash the committal of the 69 accused by the Special Assistant First Class Magistrate, Tirunelveli. 97 persons were charge-sheeted for offences under Ss. 120-B, 121-A, 153, 117, 148, 149, 201, 324, 326, 364, 302, 307, 395, 457 and 380, I.P.C.; and also for offences under Ss. 3 to 6, Indian Explosive Substances Act, S. 126, Indian Railways Act, S. 25(c), Indian Telegraph Act and S. 19(f), Indian Arms Act.
Of the persons charge-sheeted, ten were absconding and the enquiry therefore went on against the rest, the case against the absconders being separated. Of the 87, the learned Magistrate discharged 18 and committed the petitioners herein. They have been committed to take their trial, in the sessions-for offences under Ss. 120-B, 121-A, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 324, 326, 380, 397, 457, I.P.C. and Ss. 3 and 4, Indian Explosive Substances Act, S. 126, Indian Railways Act and S. 19(f), Indian Arms Act.
2. The main point that is taken to quash the committal is that the offences under Ss. 120-B and 121-A, I.P.C. were taken cognizance of even prior to the filing of the complaint under the orders of the local government. What happened in this case was t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.