SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 21

RAJAGOPALAN
N. Somasundaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N. Panchapakesa Aiyar, for Petitioner; The Special Govt. Pleader, for the State.

Judgement

ORDER :- The petitioner applied under Art. 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of certiorari, to set aside the proceedings that terminated with the order of the Inspector General of Prisons dated 30-4-1953 directing the removal of the petitioner from service.

2. The petitioner was appointed a lower division clerk in the jail department in 1934. On 28-4-1947 he was appointed to the category of Reserve Deputy Jailors. That appointment was ordered by the Inspector General of Prisons. On 21-1-1952 charges were framed against the petitioner by the Superintendent of the jail where the petitioner was employed. The petitioner submitted his explanation. He objected to the enquiry being conducted by the Superintendent.

The Deputy Superintendent of the jail was ordered to conduct the enquiry. He eventually submitted his report to the Superintendent. After issuing a notice to the petitioner to show cause why he should not be dismissed from service, and after taking into account the representations the petitioner made then, the Superintendent ordered on 21-10-1952 the dismissal of the petitioner from service. The petitioner appealed to the Inspector General of Prisons, who su

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top