SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Mad) 232

RAMASWAMI
In re, Ch. Venkatasubbayya – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Dwarakanath, for Petitioner; R. Santhanam for the Public Prosecutor, for the State.

Judgement

ORDER :- This is a criminal revision case which has been filed against the conviction and sentence of the Additional Stationary Sub-Magistrate, Ellore, in C.C. No. 2160 of 1952 which was confirmed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Eluru in C.A. No. 104 of 1053.

2. The facts lie in a brief compass : The criminal revision petitioner before us Venkatasubbayya was working as a godown keeper in Ellore Co-operative Stores. In this case there was a co-accused (second accused) who had been acquitted in the lower Court. He was the manager of the said stores. The stores has seven depots under its control. The criminal revision petitioner was in charge of the main depot. According to the bye-laws of the stores this petitioner should sell the stocks in his custody to the customers, supply stocks to the other depots, write bills for the sales made by him, credit the daily sale amount in chittas maintained by the manager and obtain a receipt from the manager on the next day after the days work. Then he should prepare an abstract of the daily sales from the bills and should account for the amounts realised by sale. In other words the actual entrustment was with and remittance was to be













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top