SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 92

KRISHNASWAMI NAYUDU
Pyari Bibi (minor) – Appellant
Versus
Andi Ranga Chariar and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. Ramachandra Iyer, for Appellants; S. Sitarama Iyer and S. Rajarama Iyer, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT : This appeal arises in a suit for redemption of a usufructuary mortgage. The plaintiff acquiring the equity of redemption under a sale deed Ex. A. 2 dated 05-4-1947, executed by Kalian, the son of Rajagopal Chetti instituted the present suit for redemption. The property was usufructuarily mortgaged by Rajagopal Chetti, the father of the vendor of the plaintiff, and his brother Krishnan Chetti to Sabji alias Abdul Rahiman for Rs. 2000 on 03-1-1926 (Ex. 13. 2).

Subsequently on 12-7-1926 a simple mortgage, Ex. B. 3 was executed by Rajagopal Chetti to the same mortgagee for a further advance of Rs. 500. The interest of Krishna Chetti was purchased by the mortgagee under Ex. B. 6 dated 15-9-1928. The suit for redemption by the plaintiff was resisted on two grounds, namely, that the plaintiff was entitled to redeem only a moiety of the property since he claimed under a sale deed executed by the son of one of the mortgagors, the other mortgagor having already parted with his interest in the property in favour of the mortgagee.

This contention was met by the plea that the property absolutely belonged to Rajagopal Chetti and his brother Krishnan Chetti had no interest and w
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top