SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 104

SOMASUNDARAM
In re Sankaralingam – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Public Prosecutor, for the State.

Judgement

ORDER :- This is a reference by the District Magistrate under the following circumstances. A case has been filed against one Sankaralingam for the offence of murder. The case was enquired into by the Sub Magistrate, Tirunelveli. The accused is said to be deaf and dumb, and according to the committal order, with the assistance of P. W. 14. a teacher in the Deaf and Dumb school, Palayamcottah, the proceedings were interpreted to the accused, and the accused appeared to understand the proceedings as interpreted by P. W. 14.

As there was a prima facie case, the Sub Magistrate committed the accused to take his trial before the Sessions Judge for the offence of murder. Under S. 341, Criminal P. C. a sub magistrate can submit the proceedings after commitment only if the accused though not insane, cannot be made to understand the proceedings.

But once he has committed, the Sessions Judge has seisin of the case, and it is not open to him to write to the District Magistrate to ask the Sub Magistrate to refer the matter to the High Court, particularly in view of the fact that so far as the Sub magistrate was concerned he was of the opinion that the accused could be made to understand t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top