MADRAS HIGH COURT
RAMASWAMI
T.Rangaswami
Versus
T. Aravindammal
A.A.O. No. 311 of 1955
Decided On : 10 August, 1956
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT - SECTION 5 - GROUNDS FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE - IMPOTENCE - DEFINITION - MEDICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS - ANALOGOUS LAWS - BURDEN OF PROOF - EVIDENCE - ISSUES - CONDUCT OF PARTIES - MEDICAL EXAMINATION - PRESUMPTIONS - DESERTION - ESSENTIAL FACTORS - CONSTRUCTIVE DESERTION - TERMINATION OF DESERTION.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, T. Rangaswami, sought divorce from his wife, Aravindammal, on the grounds of alleged impotence and alleged desertion. The respondent denied the allegations and claimed that she was not impotent and that she was not the deserting party. The petitioner and his mother testified, while the respondent and her father testified for the respondent.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent was not impotent, either at the time of the marriage or at the time of the petition, and that she was not the deserting party. The court held that the petitioner had failed to prove the grounds for divorce and dismissed the petition.
Issues: 1. Whether the respondent was impotent at the time of the marriage and continued to be so until the presentation of the petition. 2. Whether the respondent was the deserting party.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Impotence is defined as lack of ability to perform sexual act and sterility is defined as lack of ability to procreate children. 2. Impotence may be organic, atonic, or psychic. 3. The burden of proof is on the petitioner to prove that the respondent was impotent at the time of the marriage and continued to be so until the presentation of the petition. 4. Evidence of impotency may include medical evidence, the conduct of the parties, and the testimony of the parties. 5. Desertion is the termination of all joint life between the spouses, with the intention to desert the other spouse, without cause, and for at least three years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition. 6. Constructive desertion occurs when the deserting spouse makes continued joint life impossible, compelling the deserted spouse to leave the matrimonial home.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed.
JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal directed against the order and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge of Tiruchirapalli in O. P. No. 186 of 1952.
1a. This O. P. was filed under Section 5 of the Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act VI of 1949 clause (h) which provides that either party to a marriage solemnised before or after the commencement of this Act..............may pray that the marriage be dissolved on the ground that the other party was impotent at the time of marriage and continued to be so until the presentation of the petition. This Act has been repealed and replaced by the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, Section 12 (a). The Clause (h) of S. 5 of Act VI of 1949 is identical in language with clause (a) if S. 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955. Therefore no vested right has been taken away and no new right has accrued.
2. The petitioner T. Rangaswami is seeking divorce on the ground of alleged impotence and alleged desertion. He married the respondent Aravindammal, who is his own niece on 13-9-1945. After living for sometime together, the respondent has been living before the presentation of the petition with her parents for a considerable time. The case for the respondent is that she is not impotent as alleged either on the date of the marriage or on the date of the petition and that she is not the deserting party and that on the other hand she has been driven out of the house and that her husband wants to get rid of her in order to re-marry.
In the course of the enquiry this respondent produced a certificate issued by Srimati G. Ponniah, Lady Doctor, regarding her potence and this Lady Doctor has been examined also as R. W. 3. The medical evidence puts it beyond doubt that this respondent is suffering neither from organic nor atonic impotence permanent or temporary. This evidence is corroborated by the respondent examined as R. W. 1 and her father examined as R. W. 2.
This was not in any way displaced by the evidence of the petitioner examined as P. W. 1 and his mother as P. W. 3. Before the learned Subordinate Judge the issue of desertion was not pressed with any seriousness as noted by him in paragraph 6 of his order and in fact there were no materials to make out the ground of desertion put forward as a second string to the bow by the petitioner. This petition was therefore dismissed with costs. Hence this appeal.
3. In appeal I am of the same opinion as the learned Subordinate Judge on both these issues and here are my reasons.
4. Point 1. Impotence as a ground for dissolution of marriage is a medico-legal problem and I shall consider it now under both these heads.
5. Impotence is defined as lack of ability to perform sexual act and sterility is defined as lack of ability to procreate children. Questions of impotence and sterility arise when divorce is sought (a) because, marriage cannot be consummated (i.e., one of the parties is incapable of complete sexual intercourse), (b) if incapacity for consummation cannot be surgically remedied, or, the defective party is unwilling to submit to a surgical operation; or (c) if the incapacity existed before marriage. (Sterility, by itself, offers no ground for divorce). Impotence is attributed to injury to head, neck, or loins.
6. Potence in case of males means power of erection of the male organ plus discharge of healthy semen containing living spermatozoa and in the case of females means (1) development of external and internal genitals and (2) ovulation and menstruation.
7. Causes of impotence : (*Apply to males only. - *Apply to females only; those unmarked, apply to both sexes) :-
1. Organic: 1. Nervous Lesions*: Diseases of, or injury to, brain or cord. 2. Malformation or absence of parts* male organ may be absent, non-developed, ill-developed, or two or more in number; adherent to scrotum or abdomen; fibrous or cartilaginous; hypospadias; congenital phimosis, anorchidism, cryptorchidism; diseases of or accidents to or operations on the male organ, testicles or duc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.