SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 349

RAMASWAMI
M. Ponnambalam – Appellant
Versus
Saraswathi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.A. Krishnan Kutty Nair, for Petitioner; V.A.F. Coelho for Respondent.

Judgement

ORDER :- This is a revision petition which has been preferred against an order made by the learned Second Presidency Magistrate, G. T. Madras, to M. C. No. 1 of 1956.

2. The facts are: The petitioner in the lower court Saraswathi had been married by the respondent, Ponnambalam, in 1953. This Ponnambalam is a postman drawing a salary of Rs. 90 per month. Husband and wife lived happily for some time after the marriage. But as it often happens in Hindu households, the presence of the step mother of the husband had been a disturbing factor in this house-hold and husband and wife have fallen out and the wife says that she had had to go and live with her parents and on account of the fact that this Ponnambalam has not made any provision for her maintenance and has refusing and neglecting to maintain her, this Saraswathi has filed this petition under Sec. 488 Crl. P. C. On the appearance of the parties in the court, apparently they have not desired so go into the box and give evidence. There is nothing on record to show that they desired to go into the box and give evidence and that no opportunity was given to them by the Second Presidency Magistrate.

3. In fact, the parties seem t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top