RAMASWAMI
Public Prosecutor – Appellant
Versus
A. Thomas – Respondent
JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal preferred by the State of Madras against the acquittal by the learned Special Judge of Chingleput in C.C. No. 8 of 1955.
2. The case for the Prosecution is : The complainant Rajabadar, P.W. 2 is the owner of a tea stall in the bazaar road in Saidanet, a Suburb of the City of Madras. He has been carrying on this tea stall for the last ten years. P.W.2 is the owner of a house in the same street bearing door No. III, worth Rs. 5000/- P.W. 2 was getting from his tea stall business a monthly income of Rs. 100.
3. Five years ago P.W. 2 had installed a radio set in the tea shop. In fact in the City of Madras such radios which are played practically during the working hours have become the standard equipment. P.W. 2 was taking out licence for two years and was using the radio with the help of the electric connection from a neighbouring house. But later that neighbour is said to have refused to give the electric connection and the radio also is said to have gone out of order. P.W. 2 did not apply for a licence.
4. In the month following Pongal of 1934 one Inspector came and asked on seeing the aerial as to where the radio was and where was the licence. P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.