RAMACHANDRA.IYER
State of Madras – Appellant
Versus
Sulaika Beevi Ammal and others – Respondent
JUDGMENT :- This appeal arises from the decree in O. S. No. 15 of 1954, on the file of the Subordinate Judges Court, Ramanathapuram, declaring that the suit village of Neriyandooval in Mudukulathur taluk, Ramanathapuram Dt. was one to which the provisions of Madras Act XXX of 1947 and the Notifications thereunder would not apply and that the appellant could not interfere with the respondents possession of the same. The State of Madras, which was the first defendant to the action, is the appellant to the appeal. Neriyandooval was one of the 92-3/4 villages in Perungaranai Vattam which was a Dharmasanam grant by the ancient Pandyan King Sundarapandian to certain Brahmins. It is conceded that it is not an inam estate under the provisions of the Madras Act 26 of 1948. The appellant issued a notification under the provisions of Madras Act 30 of 1947, for reducing the rent. Thereupon the 9th respondent filed an application for the issue of a writ of certiorari under Art. 226 of the Constitution in C. M. P. No. 13299 of 1950 to this court for quashing the proceedings initiated by the appellant.
Having regard to the nature of the question involved and the evidence that was necessar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.