SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Mad) 163

VEERASWAMI
Sivagnana Thevar – Appellant
Versus
Udayar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.V. Venugopalachari and S. Venkatesan, for Appellant; M. Natesan, for Respondent.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- The plaintiff who failed in both the courts below has appealed to this court. He1 brought the suit for recovery of possession of the plaint first schedule properties from the defendant with future mesne profits. The properties originally belonged to one Pooli Sivasubramania Thevar of Nelkattumsevel. On 08-09-1923, he executed a deed of settlement whereby he gave a life interest in the suit properties to Sivagnanathammal whom he proposed at the time and later on married as his second wife, the remainder to his sons, if any, to be born to her, failing which to his son by his first wife by name Pooli Sivagnanapandian and his heirs. Sivagnanathammal died in 1950 issueless and her husband Pooli Sivasubramania Thevar had predecesed her. The plaintiff purchased the property under a sale, deed dated 02-05-1952 from Vellathurai Pandian the son of Pooli Sivagnanapandian. The plaintiffs case was that after the termination of the life estate on the death of Sivagnanathammal, Vellathurais father and after him; Vellathurai, became entitled to the suit properties absolutely and that he was entitled to recover possession thereof from the defendant.

2. The defendants case on the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top