SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Mad) 166

P.S.KAILASAM, GANAPATIA PILLAI
Gajavalli Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Narayanaswami Mudaliar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D. Ramaswami Aiyangar and P.K. Parthasarathi, for Appellants; V. Srinivasan, for Respondent.

Judgement

GANAPATIA PILLAI, J.:- The plaintiffs are the appellants. The first plaintiff is the widow of one Govindaswami Mudaliar and the second plaintiff is his daughter. This Govindaswami Mudaliar left a son by his first wife and he is the respondent to the appeal and defendant to the suit. Govindaswami Mudaliar died on 21-11-1953. He and his son Narayanaswami (respondent) were members of a joint Hindu family which owned the properties mentioned in the plaint. The suit was brought for partition and possession of a half share in the family properties as the share due to the first plaintiff who claimed her husbands share under the Hindu Womens Rights to Property Act, 1937. On behalf of the second plaintiff a maintenance provision of Rs.20 per month and marriage expenses of Rs.2000 were asked for.

2. The respondent resisted the suit on the strength of a settlement deed dated 17-12-1953 executed by him in favour of the first appellant which, according to him, was the result of a panchayat arrangement. It was pleaded by the respondent that this deed was registered at the instance of the first appellant and was in full settlement of all her claims against her husbands joint family proper















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top