SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Mad) 323

JAGADISAN
Raju – Appellant
Versus
Advocate-General H. C. Buildings, Madras and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. Ramachandran for Row and Reddy, for Petitioners.

Judgement

ORDER :- The petitioners pray for the issue of a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ under Art.226 of the Constitution to quash the order of the learned Advocate General of Madras dated 6-1-1961 in sanction Appln. No.1 of 1960, preferred before him for the necessary consent for the institution of a suit under S.92 C.P.C.

2. The petitioners are residents in the village of Sirunaickanpetti Dindigul taluk, Mathurai Dt. and they are Roman Catholic Christians by religion. The bulk of the population of the village of Sirunaickenpatti consists of Roman Catholic Christians. There is a Church in the village, St. Anthonys Church and there is also another church, the Church of St. Thomas situated on the top of a hillock near the village. The Catholic Christians of the village appear to have raised funds for levying contributions and subscriptions from all the Catholics and purchased statutes, pictures, ornaments, and carriage for carrying corpses to the burial ground and other articles necessary and useful for the Christian population residing in the locality.

Respondents 2 to 4 in this petition are stated to be functioning as trustees managing the communal properties. The art




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top