SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Mad) 380

VEERASWAMI, RAMAMURTI
S. Chokalingam Asari – Appellant
Versus
N. S. Krishna Iyer and others – Respondent


Judgement

RAMAMURTI, J. :- This Letters Patent Appeal arises out of restitution proceedings in O. S. No. 37 of 1951, Sub-Court, Madurai. The first respondent herein is the judgment-debtor. The second respondent is the decree-holder-purchaser and the appellant is a purchaser from the decree-holder-purchaser.

2. The second respondent filed the suit, O. S. No. 37 of 1951, to recover a sum of nearly Rs. 9050 as due to him in respect of two loans, Rs. 6000 and Rs. 2000 respectively and obtained a decree for that sum together with subsequent interest on 18-11-1952. The first respondent herein, the debtor, filed an appeal to this Court in A. S. No. 174 of 1953 (Mad) and during the pendency of the appeal, it appears, the debtor paid several sums on various dates in all amounting to Rs. 3500, but he did not completely comply with the conditions subject to which stay of execution was ordered by the High Court. The decree-holder therefore pursued his execution petition and purchased the properties himself at the auction sale on 21-6-1954, for sum of Rs. 6015. The judgment-debtor filed an application under O. XXI, R. 90, C.P.C., to set aside the sale but it was dismissed and the sale was confirm







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top