SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Mad) 395

MADRAS HIGH COURT
S. RAMACHANDRA IYER,RAMAKRISHNAN
Venkataswami Naidu
Versus
State of Madras represented by the Collector of Salem
Writ Appeal No. 184 of 1962
Decided On : 7 November, 1963

Advocates Appeared:
T.V. Balakrishnan and N. Vanchinathan, for Appellants; Addl. Govt. Pleader, for Respondents.

A letter expressing disappointment with a compensation amount can constitute a request for a reference under S. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act.

Headnote:

Mandamus - Land Acquisition - The court held that the appellants' letter expressing disappointment with the compensation amount constituted a request for a reference under S. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants filed an application for a writ of mandamus to direct the Tahsildar and Land Acquisition Officer to make a reference under S. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, expressing disappointment with the compensation amount.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the letter from the appellants constituted a request for a reference under S. 18 of the Act, and therefore allowed the appeal and issued the writ as prayed for.

Issues: The main issue was whether the appellants' letter expressing disappointment with the compensation amount constituted a request for a reference under S. 18 of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the appellants' letter as a clear expression of non-acceptance of the compensation amount, thereby constituting a request for a reference under S. 18 of the Act.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and a writ was issued in terms prayed for, with the appellants being awarded costs.

Judgement

S. RAMACHANDRA IYER, C.J. :- This appeal from the judgment of Jagadisan, J., arises out of an application filed by the appellants herein for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the Tahsildar and Land Acquisition Officer, Krishnagiri to make a reference under S. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The award was delivered on 22nd September, 1957. Within six weeks therefrom, on 7-10-1957, the appellants addressed a letter to the Tahsildar and Land Acquisition Officer expressing their extreme disappointment on the amount fixed as compensation and stating that the amount of compensation, which included the value of the site as well as the standing trees, was very low. The letter which is in tamil further reads :

"As you have not taken into account our objections and the record produced by us and as you have not included the value of the trees, the amount now determined by you is very low. We hereby make known to you that we are not in a position to accept that amount as compensation."

Reading between the lines one can easily see that the appellants did want proper compensation being awarded to them. One can reasonably draw the inference that they wanted the Tahsildar to take appropriate steps to secure that end as otherwise there will be no meaning for that letter at all. In a recent case, W. A. No. 150 of 1963 (Mad), we had a similar situation. The statement, in a letter to the Tahsildar in that case was that the market value of the land was really higher than what has been estimated. We held that the implication of that letter was that the respondent did not accept the estimate and that he sought for a reference to Court. In the present case the position is even clearer. The appellants have expressly stated that they are not accepting the compensation. We have no hesitation in holding that the implication of this letter is that they have asked for a reference under S. 18 of the Act.

2. The appeal is allowed and a writ will issue in terms prayed for. The appellants will have their costs here.

Appeal allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top