SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1883 Supreme(Mad) 126

A TURNER, KT., KERNAN
Venkataramanjulu Nayudu – Appellant
Versus
Ramachandra Nayudu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Charles A. Turner, Kt., C.J.

1. The clause respecting the payment of rent at the highest rates payable in the neighbourhood on land formerly dry, which might be irrigated from a Government source of supply, and the clause relating to the payment of such rates as the lessors might agree to take for the cultivation of land in excess of the holdings and unassessed, appear to us to be objectionable, because they are indefinite. The Act intends that the rate of rent should be ascertained and declared even where the rate may vary with the means of cultivation or the frequency of cultivation, or where the quantum of rent may vary with an increase or reduction in the area of the holding.

2. We must affirm the decree and dismiss the appeal with costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top