SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1887 Supreme(Mad) 2

Srinivasaiengar Alias – Appellant
Versus
Sivasubramaniam Pillai, Minor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. In Second Appeals Nos. 1, 3 and 28 of 1887 : The memorandom of objections is not pressed.

2. The defendant will accept the patta in accordance with the terms found by the Subordinate Judge. Each party will pay his own costs in these appeals.

3. In second appeal 3 of 1887 : Exhibit G. shows that the memorandom of objections is not sustainable, as it is provided that if an excess crop is raised on single crop land besides the single crop, the tirva thereof shall be paid to the circar.

4. The defendant will accept the Patta as decreed by the Subordinate Judge. Each party to bear his own costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top