SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1915 Supreme(Mad) 558

SADASIVA.AIYAR
Ranga Aiyangar – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Chariar Alias – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sadasiva Aiyar, J.

1. The plaintiffs are the appellants. The first plaintiffs father, Srinivasa Aiyangar, mortgaged the plaint properties with possession to the defendants ancestor, Srinivasachariar in 1864. The Othi deed contained also a covenant by the mortgagor to pay the mortgage money personally. The defendants ancestor brought a suit against Srinivasa Aiyangars sons in 1867 for recovery of the Othi amount of Rs. 136 on the charge of the mortgaged property (the plaint itself was not filed in the records but the suit might be taken as having, contained the usual prayers for sale on default and for recovery of the balance, if any, from the defendants therein to the extent of their (sic) properties). In April 1872, the decree, Exhibit A, was passed of which the operative portion is as follows:

"The plaintiffs obtain from the defendants the suit amount and all the costs of the suit, that the Othi property be sold in order to satisfy the decree, in case the decree amount be not paid within 6 months, from this day, that the plaintiff is entitled to obtain interest on costs at 12 per cent, per annum from this day and that the defendants are entitled to obtain possession of the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top