SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1916 Supreme(Mad) 439

S.AIYANGAR
Rasa Goundan – Appellant
Versus
Pichamuthu Pillai – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. In this case the suit was filed against a dead person, There was, therefore, really no suit at all and in such case I do not think there was any power of amendment in the lower Court The present case is covered by the authority of the decision in Veerappa Chetty v Ponnan 31 M. 86: 17 M. L. J. 551: 3 M. L. T. 12. The learned Pleader for the respondent contends that the new Code provides for such, amendent. I do not agree a he decision of the lower Court is reverse and the suit is dismissed with coats here and in the lower Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top