SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1917 Supreme(Mad) 197

W.AYLING, S.AIYAR
Muthia Naik – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


ORDER

1. Petitioners Vakil contends that the composition of an offence under Section 345 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with one of several accused persons has the effect of an acquittal of all the accused persons. We can find nothing in the section to support this interpretation and if this is really the meaning of the learned Judges in Chandra Kumar Das v. Emperor 7. C.W.N. 176, we must respectfully dissent. No other authority is quoted by petitioner.

2. The petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top