1. We must call for a finding as to whether at the time of the suit the right to collect monies due to the trust had devolved solely on the plaintiff.

2. Fresh evidence may be adduced, if desired. The finding will be submitted within two months from this date, and the parties will be at liberty to file objections to the said finding within seven days after notice of the return of the same shall have been posted up in this Court.

3. We must accept the finding that the promissory-note sued on was executed to Ulagappa Chettiar as trustee of the charity. The question whether the said payee could alone have maintained the suit without joining his co-trustees was not raised in the Court below. It would depend in each case upon the powers and duties of the managing trustee whether such a person is competent to represent the trust solely. That question has not been put in issue and we are not prepared to allow it to be debated now.

4. Another question which was argued at some length need not be discussed now, namely, whether if there is an assignment of the note by the act of parties, it should not be only in the mode prescribed by the Negotiable Instruments Act. There is a considerable