SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(Mad) 153

In Re: Erada Padinharedil – Appellant
Versus
Unknown – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Walter Salis Schwabe, K.C., C.J.

1. In this case we are of opinion that the Writ of Habeas Corpus must go. The matter is urgent, and therefore, we propose to direct the writ to go. The matter is also an important one, and it is desirable that our reasons should be put in writing and delivered in the form of a formal judgment hereafter. But, meanwhile the order of the Court will be that a writ do issue, addressed to the Jailor, Bellary Camp Jail, to this effect:

We command you that you have in the High Court of judicature at Madras, immediately after the receipt of this our Writ, the bodies of Erada Padinharedil Govindan Nayar and Erada Padinharedil Raman Nayar being taken and detained under your custody, as is said, together with the day and cause of their being taken and detained by whatsoever names they may be called therein, to undergo and receive all and singular such matters and things as our said Court shall then and there consider of concerning them in this behalf; and have you there then this our Writ.

2. After the production of the said prisoners in obedience to the writ issued by this Court on Monday the 1st day of May 1922,

ORDER

1. This is a petition for a Writ of Ha










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top