Sooppiadath Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Irimbantakath Manha Mammad Kunhi – Respondent
1. The plaintiff-appellant brings this suit for the recovery of an elephant and also certain documents in the possession of the defendants. The defendants are the children and the wives of one Moossankutty, the deceased younger brother of the plaintiff. The plaintiff bases his claim as karnavan of the tavazhi consisting of the children of one Asya, the mother of the plaintiff and Moossankutty and it is alleged that Moossankutty bought this elephant out of tavazhi property and consequently the karnavan is now entitled to possession. As regards the documents it is said that they relate to tavazhi property and that the plaintiff is the proper custodian.
2. The first argument advanced in appeal is with reference to the procedure adopted in the lower Court. The Subordinate Judge stated that the nature of certain properties situated in Chandranalloor was not in issue in the suit and he would not allow any further questions to be asked as to whether they were tavazhi properties or not. It is now stated that not only was oral evidence excluded but also documentary evidence. The plaintiff has filed a list of documents which he said were so excluded. When the Subordinate Judge gave th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.