SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(Mad) 224

KRISHNAN
C. K. Ramaswami Goundan – Appellant
Versus
Muthu Velappa Gounder – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Krishnan, J.

1. These petitions arise in connection with the election of the president of the Taluk Board of Gobichettypalayam under the new Madras Local Boards Act, XIV of 1920. Petitioner before us, Mr. Ramaswami Gounder and one of the respondents Mr. Venkatesa Aiyar were the rival candidates for the place. In the election on the 15th of March last, the date fixed for it, Mr. Gounder was declared duly elected. Thereupon an application O.P. No. 51 of 22 was made to the District Judge of Coimbatore. under Section 57 of the Act to have it declared that Mr. Gounder was disqualified as a member under Section 55 Clause (2), (5) and therefore unfit to be a President under Section 15 Clause (1). On this petition the District Judge gave a declaration that Mr. Gounder was disqualified for appointment as a member. It may be mentioned that the date fixed for the new Taluk Board to come into existence in the notification under Rule 9 of the Transitory rules was the 1st of March; the elections and nominations were over by the 21st of February on which date the president of the District Board, Coimbatore, had nominated Mr. Gounder as a member of the new Board to take effect from the 1st





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top