SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1922 Supreme(Mad) 312

SCHWABE
M. Koru Kutty – Appellant
Versus
Valikathodiyil Ahammad – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Schwabe, C.J.

1. This is a second appeal from the judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Ottapalam, reversing the judgment of District Munsif of Tirur. The plaintiff is suing for the redemption of a mortgage. He and the defendant were at one time joint mortgagees. He puts his right to redeem the mortgage mainly on the ground that he was a purchaser or assignee of the rights of certain legatees under the Will of the mortgagor. It was alleged by the defendant that the Will was not valid, and so in effect he said : "you have no title under the Will. Whoever is in a position to redeem it, you are not."

2. The District Munsif found as a fact that the Will was duly executed and was genuine. The Subordinate Judge found as a fact that the Will was not duly executed. Sitting in Second Appeal, it is not open to us, I regret to say, in this case, to review the judgment of the Subordinate Judge on a question of fact. The plaintiff however, said : "I have got another ground on which I am entitled to redeem, and that is, I have taken a fresh lease or a renewal of the lease of the property from the jenmi," and he says, that he has raised that in his plaint.

3. The defendant replied to it by sa











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top