SPENCER
V. Parthasarathy Aiyangar And – Appellant
Versus
Doraiswami Naicker – Respondent
Spencer, J.
1. The question referred to us is whether a tenant in occupation of trust lands belonging to a temple or. mosque can enforce a compulsory sale under Section 9 of the Madras City Tenants Protection Act and require the temple or mosque to deliver the land to him on a valuation to be made by the court.
2. There is no difficulty to my mind in including the trustees of temples mosques and other religious endowments within the definition of "landlord" in Section 2 of Madras Act No. 111 of 1922 as they certainly are persons entitled to collect the rent of the land on behalf of another person. A greater difficulty arises when we come to consider Section 9. This section pr vides for the compulsory sale by a landlord of land in the possession of atenant in the City of Madras from which the tenant "sough to be ejected in a suit instituted under the Presidency Small land as the interest of the landlord in the land and all other-interests which he can convey under any power What are the interests which he can convey under any power? If they sgmfy easements and other subsidiary interests, it would have been easy for the Act to so describe them. If the title to the land is inten
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.