SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1925 Supreme(Mad) 134

Perumal Naick – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


ORDER

1. This is an application to quash the proceedings, now pending before the Sub-Magistrate of Sattur, on the ground that no complaint was field in the case to enable the Magistrate to take proceedings against the petitioner. The petitioner made a statement to the Village Munsif of Mala Raja Kularaman, that a dacoity was committed in his house and mentioned certain persons as having taken part in the dacoity. The Village Munsif forwarded the complaint to the Police, who held an investigation and referred the case as false. The Sub-Magistrate of Srivilliputtur, to whom the papers were sent, accepted the referred charge-sheet and struck the case of his file. The police put in a charge sheet before the Sub-Divional Magistrate of Sivakasi, against the petitioner for an offence under Section 211, I.P.C. The Sub-Divisional magistrate transferred the case to the Second Class Magistrate of Sattur. The contention of the petitioner is that there is no complaint from the Second Class Magistrate of Srivilliputtur who acted on the referred charge sheet of an offence under Section 211 and therefore the proceedings are illegal.

2. Without expressing an opinion on that contention, we are satisfi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top