SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1925 Supreme(Mad) 118

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MARAS
Devadoss
Viswanatha Mudali And Anr.
Versus
Doraiswami Mudali And Anr.
Decided On : 12 February, 1925

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the descendants of illegitimate sons of a dancing woman are considered Hindus and governed by Hindu Law, and the principle of collateral succession applies to them, establishing heritable blood between them.

Headnote:

Illegitimate Sons - Hindu Law - Collateral Succession - [Illegitimate Sons] - [Hindu Law] - [No specific act sections referenced] - The court discussed the application of Hindu Law to the descendants of illegitimate sons of a dancing woman and their right to collateral succession. The court held that the illegitimate sons of a Hindu mother are considered Hindus and are governed by Hindu Law, and that the principle of collateral succession applies to the descendants of illegitimate sons, establishing heritable blood between them.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiffs sought a declaration that the sale of the property in favor of the defendants was not binding on them as reversioners of Murugesa Mudali. The District Munsif dismissed the suit, but the Subordinate Judge reversed the decree, holding the plaintiffs as reversionary heirs and remanded the suit. The defendants appealed.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the plaintiffs, as descendants of illegitimate sons of a dancing woman, were considered Hindus and governed by Hindu Law. It held that the principle of collateral succession applied to their descendants, establishing heritable blood between them.

Issues: The main issue was whether the descendants of illegitimate sons of a dancing woman had heritable blood between them and were entitled to collateral succession under Hindu Law.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that the illegitimate sons of a Hindu mother are considered Hindus and are governed by Hindu Law, and that the principle of collateral succession applies to their descendants, establishing heritable blood between them.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court's decision in favor of the plaintiffs, and held that they were the reversionary heirs to Murugesa Mudali.

JUDGMENT

Devadoss, J.

1. The plaintiffs sue for a declaration that the sale of the plaint property in favour of defendants 1 and 2 is not binding on them as they are the reversioners of one Murugesa Mudali. They claim to he the grandsons of Muthusami Mudali, the divided brother of Kachi Muniappa Mudali, whose great-grandson was the deceased Murugesa Mudali. The District Munsif held that Muthusami Mudali and Kachi Muniappa Mudali being the sons of a prostitute there was no heritable blood between them and the plaintiffs had no reversionary right to the estate of Murugesa Mudali and dismissed the suit. The Subordinate Judge has reversed the decree of the District Munsif holding that the plaintiffs are reversionary heirs to Murugesa Mudali and has remanded the suit for disposal on the merits. Defendants 1 and 2 have preferred this appeal.

2. Muthuswami Mudali and Kachi Muniappa Mudali were the? sons of a dancing woman called Thanji Ammal. It is admitted that the plaintiffs are the legitimate grandsons of Muthuswami Mudali and that Murugesa Mudali was the legitimate great grandson of Kachi Muniappa Mudali. The question for decision is, does the rule of collateral succession obtain among the legitimate descendants of the two sons of a dancing woman whose paternity is unknown. There is no authority on the point in the Hindu Law books. We have not been referred to any decision in which the question was raised or decided. The principle applicable to the present case has to be deduced from the texts of the Hindu Law books and some of the decided cases.

3. A good deal of the argument in this case was with reference to the rights and disabilities of the illegitimate sons of Sudras. It is well settled that the illegitimate son of a man belonging to the twice-born class cannot inherit to his putative father ; he has only a right to maintenance, but in the case of Sudras, the illegitimate son inherits to his father, his share being half of that of the legitimate son, and he takes the whole in certain circumstances. West & Buhler, 82, 194, 3rd Edition. Courts have gone to the length of holding that a mans legitimate grandson by an illegitimate son succeeds to him in preference to a divided brother on the theory of representation [Ramalinga Muppan v. Pavadai, Goundan (1901) ILR 25 M 519 : 11 MLJ 399. It is unnecessary to consider in detail all the decisions that have been quoted at the bar with regard to the rights of illegitimate sons. It is a misnomer to call the son of a dancing woman whose paternity is unknown an illegitimate son. The illegitimate son is one born out of wedlock, i.e., no marriage was solemnized between the father and the mother. In the case of sons of prostitutes or dancing women the paternity is unknown and it is only an euphemism to call them illegitimate sons. In Roman Law they are called Nullius-Filius. Dancing women have their peculiar customs. Their status is recognised in Hindu society. Their customs have received he sanction of judicial decisions and the adoption of girls by them is recognised by law, and the daughters of dancing women inherit in preference to their sons.

4. The question in this case is what is the law which is applicable to the descendants of the sons of a dancing woman assuming that the parentage of the sons is unknown and that they are not the sons of one individual. In Subbaratna Mudali v. Balakrishnaswami Naidu (1917) 33 MLJ 207 a Bench of this Court held that the male members of the dancing girl caste are Hindus and are usually governed by the Hindu Law and usage. At p. 20S the learned Judges observe:

All the women appear to have followed the profession of a prostitute. That members of this caste are Hindus is certain, though the ancient writers and their modern exponents find some difficulty in fixing them in one of the four castes ; but whether they belong to the Sudra or fourth caste or to a separate fifth caste is immaterial. That male members of this caste are usually governed by the Hindu La


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top