V.SASTRI, V.M.TROTTER
Gandha Horliah – Appellant
Versus
Janoo Hassan – Respondent
1. This case raises a point of some interest that has been much discussed in the English Courts and has very recently been the subject of a decision by Mr. Justice Macleod as he then was sitting in the, High Court of Bombay Boggiano & Co., v. Arab Steamers 33 Ind. Cas. 536 : 40 B. 529 : 18 Bom. L.R. 126. It is not disputed by the appellant that if Mr. Justice Macleods judgment is correct he is out of Court. The defendant was the owner of two steamers which were chartered by the plaintiff for the carriage of rice from Akyab to the Coromandel coast. The importation of rice was only permitted, and Mr. Justice Waller, the Trial Judge, has very rightly found that this was a fact perfectly within the knowledge of the parties, if and when a certificate could be obtained from the Food Controller. The learned Judge has also rightly found and this part of his judgment is not challenged that neither party to the contract committed himself to a guarantee that such a certificate would be forthcoming. As to that no question arises and the learned Judge, therefore, thinks that the execution of the contract became, impossible owing to an act which is neither under, the Control of the parti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.