SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1925 Supreme(Mad) 441

Gandha Korliah – Appellant
Versus
Janoo Hassan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This case raises a point of some interest that has been much discussed in the English Courts and has very recently been the subject of a decision by Mr. Justice MacLeod, as he then was, sitting in the High Court of Bombay. Boggiano and Co. v. The Arab Steamers Co. Ltd. (1915) ILR 40 B 529. It is not disputed by the appellant that if Mr. Justice Macleods judgment is correct he is out pf Court. The defendant was the owner of two steamers which were chartered by the plaintiff for the carriage of rice from Akyab to the Coromandel Coast. The importation of rice was only permitted--and Mr. Justice Waller, the Trial Judge, has very rightly found that this was a fact perfectly within the knowledge of the parties--if and when a certificate could be obtained from the Food Comptroller. The learned Judge has also rightly found--and this part of his judgment is not challenged--that neither party to the contract committed himself to a guarantee that such a certificate would be forthcoming. As to that no question arises and the learned Judge therefore thinks that the execution of the contract became impossible owing to an act which is neither under the control of the parties nor which




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top