SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1925 Supreme(Mad) 561

ODGERS
Mathilda Sice – Appellant
Versus
Fritz Gaebele – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Odgers, J.

1. This is an appeal against the final decree of the Subordinate Judge of Salem in a mortgage suit. By Ex. A, dated 24th August 1886, one Jules Sice, who was a coffee planter in the Shevaroy Hills mortgaged certain property, namely, 1/2 of the Tanny Pandal Estate and the whole of the St. Josephs Estate, to one Lob Levyt. In 1892 Jules Sice, the mortgagor, died. His widow, sons and daughters are the defendants in this case. On the 31st July 1908, Madame Sice, the widow of Jules Sice entered into a contract, Ex. B, with one Mr. Fritz Gaebele, by which the latter undertook to work the coffee estate and to furnish the necessary money for it, which latter should bear interest at 8 per cent. Mr. Fritz Gaebele was to be treated as the first mortgagee of the estate for Rs. 24,000 and was to work the plantation without any interference from the defendants. The agreement provided that an account and inventory should be taken on the 1st March every year and that after providing for certain charges the profits should be divided by allotting 60 per cent. to the hypothecation debt 25 per cent. to Madame Sice, and her heirs and 15 per cent. for management. The contract was to la








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top