SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1925 Supreme(Mad) 752

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MARAS
Official Receiver Of South Kanara
Versus
Bastiao Souza
Decided On : 16 December, 1925

Creditors, including the Official Receiver, have the right to proceed under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, despite having another remedy under Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act.

Headnote:

Transfer of Property Act - Creditors' Rights - The court held that the creditors, including the Official Receiver, have the right to proceed under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, despite having another remedy under Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act. The appeal was allowed, and the lower court was directed to admit and hear it.

Fact of the Case:

The court found that there is nothing in the Provincial Insolvency Act or in Mariappa Pillai v. Raman Chettiyar [1919] 42 Mad. 322, to prevent the creditors and the Official Receiver from proceeding under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the appeal and directed the lower court to admit and hear it.

Issues: The issue was whether the creditors and the Official Receiver have the right to proceed under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act despite having another remedy under Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the creditors and the Official Receiver have the right to sue under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, and this right is not deprived by their remedy under Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the lower court was directed to admit and hear it. Costs up to date will abide the result.

JUDGMENT

1. There is nothing in the Provincial Insolvency Act or in Mariappa Pillai v. Raman Chettiyar [1919] 42 Mad. 322, to prevent the creditors and, therefore, the Official Receiver, from proceeding under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act if they wish; and the fact that they have another remedy under Section 53 of the Provincial Insolvency Act does not deprive them of their right of suit under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act.

2. The appeal must be allowed and the lower Court is directed to admit the appeal and hear it.

3. Costs up to date will abide the result.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top