SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1923 Supreme(Mad) 18

WALLACE
S. Parthasarathy Aiyar – Appellant
Versus
M. Subbaroya Gramany – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Walter Salis Schwabe, K.C., C.J.

1. One Jambulinga owned two adjoining houses in Mylapore. He purported to mortgage them to one Subbusami who was a brother of the husband of Meenakshi, Jainbulingas daughter. He then died and left a Will appointing his widow Mylathammal executrix and giving her power to sell his property for the purpose of paying debts and to enjoy what was left during her life, and bequeathing after her death what was left to Meenakshi. Probate has never been taken out of the Will. Some-years later, the widow purported to sell the property to Rajagopal her brother for Rs. 1,000. The documents of title were handed over to him, the sale deed was registered and in the presence of the Registrar a thousand rupees were handed over by Rajagopal to the widow. Subbusami joined in that sale by acknowledging the discharge of his mortgage which was for a larger amount, the sale deed providing that the sale was for the purpose of discharging that mortgage. Many years afterwards, Rajagopal purported to sell the property to Subbaroya Gramany for Rs. 4,000 and he, with the assistance of Rajagopal, mortgaged the premises to the plaintiff for Rs. 2,000, it being stated that R















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top