SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1923 Supreme(Mad) 98

AYLING
In Re: Thachroth Hydross – Appellant
Versus
Unknown – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ayling, J.

1. The three accused in this case have been convicted of dacoity in the house of one Krishnan Nair of Olavattoor and murdering him by beating him to death. The offence was committed on the night of 24-10-1921 in the course of the Mopla rebellion. The prosecution evidence tends to show that about night-fall a band of some 25 armed rebels attacked a small hamlet consisting of about 5 houses of which Krishnan Nairs was one All were looted, the inmates of these houses escaped but Krishnan Nair was caught and beaten twice, the second time with fatal results, and his body thrown into a well. The well is said to have subsequently been filled up and the body has not been found; but, in the light of the evidence in this case, we see no reason whatever to doubt that Krishnan Nair was killed that night in the course of the dacoity. We have the evidence of four of the inhabitants of the hamlet who depose to this occurrence and to have seen the three appellants, who were well-known to them, beat Krishnan Nair and throw his body in the morning into the well.

2. Before discussing the merits of the case, I shall deal with two preliminary objections taken to the procedure of the sp















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top