SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1923 Supreme(Mad) 84

KRISHNAN
Bolimati Murigadu – Appellant
Versus
Nalla Bapadu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Krishnan, J.

1. The order of the District Munsif is clearly opposed to the ruling in Govindasami Pillai v. Municipal Council, Kumbakonam 45 Ind. Cas. 95 : 41 M. 620 : 34 M.L.J : 399. The learned Munsif has found that the petitioners are paupers but has travelled beyond the four corners of the plaint and relied on evidence to hold that the petitioners have "no cause of action." The plaint certainly discloses a cause of action and it was not open to the Court to go beyond it and. come to a finding which, in reality, is a finding that the petitioners are not likely to succeed en the cause of action alleged. The civil revision petition is allowed and the order of the lower Court is set aside and the petitioners are given leave to sue in forma pauperis. Costs will abide and follow the result of the suit.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top