IN THE HIGH COURT OF MARAS
Oldfield
Govindu Kaviraj Purohito
Versus
Gauranga Saw And Ors. And Vogadhu
Decided On : 16 February, 1923
Amendment - Cause Title - The court dismissed the application to amend the cause title in a Second Appeal and to excuse the delay, as an appeal cannot be presented against a person who has ceased to exist.
Fact of the Case:
The applications to the Court were to amend the cause title in a Second Appeal and to excuse the delay in seeking that relief, as the respondent had died before the presentation.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the applications and the Second Appeal on the ground that no such proceeding as an appeal against a party who is deceased is authorized by the Code.
Issues: Amendment of cause title, Excuse for delay, Appeal against deceased party
Ratio Decidendi: An appeal cannot be presented against a person who has ceased to exist, and the power to amend the cause title or excuse the delay was not applicable in this case.
Final Decision: The applications to amend the cause title and excuse the delay were dismissed, and the Second Appeal was also dismissed. No costs in the Second Appeal, but the petitioner will pay the respondents' costs in the petitions.
Oldfield, J.
1. These are applications to the Court to amend the cause title in a Second Appeal and to excuse the delay in seeking that relief. It will of course be unnecessary to consider the second application, unless the first succeeds. The circumstances, in which the amendment is asked for are that the respondent, whose name is entered in the appeal as presented, died before the presentation. We are now asked to substitute for his name those of his legal representatives. The objection to this is that an appeal cannot be presented against a person who has ceased to exist. Order 1, Rule 10 is relied on, but we do not see our way to apply it here since it refers only to suits instituted in the name of a wrong person, and we do not think that it is applicable to a case, such as the present. The power conferred by Section 153 is general, but again we do not think we ought to use it, while another course is open to the petitioner, that course being to file another appeal and to have the delay due to his mistake committed in good faith excused. Taking this view we must dismiss these applications and also the Second Appeal on the ground that no such proceeding as an appeal against a party, who is deceased, is authorised by the Code. There will be no costs in the Second Appeal but the petitioner will pay the respondents costs in the petitions.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.