SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Mad) 99

KRISHNAN
T. Devarajulu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Kondammal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Krishnan, J.

1. The plaintiffs sue for a declaration that; they are entitled to the properties in the plaint A and B schedules and the value of the schedule properties. There was a dispute likely to lead to a breach of the peace, with reference to these properties, between the plaintiffs and the defendants and the matter was taken up by the Magistrate under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Magistrates order, which was read to me, shows that, finding himself unable to say which party was in possession of the properties, he directed the properties to be attached under Section 146, Criminal Procedure Code, and placed them in the possession of a Receiver, pending the decision of the Civil Court, in favour of one or other of the parties. It is as a result of that order that this suit has been brought by the plaintiffs for an adjudication, as stated above, that they are the persons entitled to the properties.

2. It is objected in Second Appeal in limine that the suit as brought; is not maintainable, that plaintiffs ought to have sued for possession of the properties as well, and that they are not entitled to ask for a mere declaration, under Section 42 of the Spec










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top