SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Mad) 144

V.RAO
Kuppakkal Died K. Ponnuswami – Appellant
Versus
Unknown – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Venkatasubba Rao, J.

1. One Rangaswami Chetty sold to the 1st defendant under Ex. I, dated 26th June, 1917, a strip of land about 102 feet long and 21 feet wide having a frontage on a public road out of a large block of building vacant site of which he was the owner. The portion purchased by the 1st defendant I shall call site No. A. The land exclusive of site No. A may, for the purposes of this appeal, be regarded as consisting of two parts : (1) The portion south of and contiguous to what was sold to the 1st defendant opening also on the public road (this 1 shall call site No. B); and (2) the bulk of the property at the back of the site No. A and the site No. B to which access from the road was over the said site No. B (this I shall call site No. C).

2. Three days subsequent to the sale of site No. A Rangaswami Chetty sold the remainder of the block, sites Nos. B and C, to certain persons from whom the present plaintiffs de-. rive title. On the site No. C the plaintiffs constructed a ginning factory. The 1st defendant, to start with, built a small house facing the road on her own site, site No. A, leaving the rest of her land at the back of her house as an open space. She t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top