Victor Murray Coutts Trotter, C.J.

1. In this case the plaintiff was in occupation of some land cultivating it by a tenant. Government claimed that it was their land, and on the 17th of April, 1919, they sent her a notice to quit under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act III of 1905. Nothing happened for a time. In May, 1919 the plaintiff put in a petition for a review of this notice to the Deputy Collector. On the 18th of September 1919 the Deputy Collector dismissed the review petition. On the 2nd of October, 1919 an order which amounted practically to a notice to quit went to the plaintiff. On the 22nd of December, 1919 the plaintiff filed the present suit for vindicating her alleged rights of ownership in the Civil Court.

2. The Courts below have declared that suit to be barred by limitation by reason of Section 14 of the Act which says, " Nothing contained in this Act shall be held to prevent persons deeming themselves aggrieved by any proceedings under this Act except as herein provided from applying to the Civil Court for redress." (That is what this woman has done). " Provided that the Civil Courts shall not take cognizance of any suit instituted by such persons fo