SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1924 Supreme(Mad) 623

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MARAS
Devadoss
Veera Raghavachariar
Versus
The Secretary Of State For India In
Decided On : 18 October, 1924

The Government's declaration of a public purpose under the Land Acquisition Act shall be conclusive evidence of the fact, and the Indian Legislature has the authority to frame laws for the acquisition of land.

Headnote:

Land Acquisition Act - Public Purpose - Section 6, Clause 3 - Act XX of 1852, Act VI of 1857 - The court discussed the provision in Section 6, Clause (3) of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 and its historical context, emphasizing that the declaration by the Government of a public purpose shall be conclusive evidence of the fact. The court also highlighted the powers of the Indian Legislature and its authority to frame laws for the acquisition of land, concluding that the purpose for which the acquisition was made was for public purposes within the meaning of the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The Government proposed to acquire house sites for panchamas in the Tanjore District under the Land Acquisition Act. The plaintiff challenged the acquisition, arguing that it was not for a public purpose.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the purpose for which the acquisition was made was for public purposes within the meaning of the Land Acquisition Act, and the provision in Section 6, Clause (3) that the declaration shall be conclusive evidence that the land is needed for public purposes is intra vires of the Indian Legislature.

Issues: The issues included the public purpose of the acquisition, the validity of Section 6, Clause (3) of the Land Acquisition Act, and the authority of the Indian Legislature to frame laws for the acquisition of land.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the historical context of the legislative provisions, the powers of the Indian Legislature, and the authority of the Government to determine public purpose. It concluded that the purpose for the acquisition was indeed for public purposes.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the judgment would govern the connected second appeals.

JUDGMENT

Devadoss, J.

1. The first point raised in this second appeal is that the acquisition of house-sites for panchamas is not a public purpose and the Court can go into the question whether it is a public purpose or not, notwithstanding the notification by the Government that the acquisition was for a public purpose. The second point raised is that Section 6, Clause 3 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 is ultra vires of Indian Legislature inasmuch as the clause states that the said declaration, meaning the declaration by the Government, shall be conclusive evidence that the land is needed for public purposes or for a Company as the case may be. It is convenient to consider the first two points together.

2. The argument of Mr. Muthiah Mudaliar, for the appellant, is that by enacting the provision in Clause 3 of Section 6, that the declaration shall be conclusive evidence, that the land is needed for public purposes or for a Company, the Indian Legislature has taken away the right of suit by the party and that Courts are not precluded from considering whether the purpose for which the lands are acquired under the Land Acquisition Act is a public purpose or not and if it is not a public purpose the mere declaration by the Government, that it is a public purpose would not make the acquisition legal. It is not contended on behalf of the respondent that the right of suit has been taken away by Clause 3 of Section 6. All that Section 6, Clause (3) declares is that if the Government declares that a certain purpose for which it wants to acquire the lands is a public purpose, it shall be conclusive evidence of the fact.

3. The provision in Section 6 of Clause (3) that the declaration shall be conclusive evidence is not a new provision enacted in 1894. In Act XX of 1852, Section 1 there is a provision similar to this. Section 1 is in these terms: "Whenever it shall appear to the Governor of Fort Saint George in Council that any land is needed for a public purpose, he shall make a declaration to that effect in a minute of Council and such a declaration shall be conclusive evidence that the purpose for which the land is needed is a public purpose."A similar provision was enacted in Act VI of 1857, s. II. "The Government may take any land on a simple declaration under the signature of a Secretary that it is required for public purposes." This power the Legislature had before the Government of India Act of 1858 and it cannot be said that the Indian Legislature enacted a provision, it had no power to enact, before the Government of India Act of 1858. The Government of India Act conferred upon the Indian Legislature the powers which it had when the Government was under the East Indian Company. That being so, it cannot be said, that the provision in Section 6 Clause (3) is ultra vires of the Indian Legislature.

4. Before discussing the cases quoted on either side, it is best to consider what has been done by the Government. The panchamas, the farm labourers of the Tanjore District have been living on lands belonging to the mirasidars or owners of the lands. They had no rights to the sites on which they built their houses and they were liable to be evicted or turned out at the will and pleasure of the landlord. In order to improve the condition of the panchamas, the Government proposed to acquire the sites and parcel them out to those, who were willing to build houses on the sites. With this object, the Government appointed a Deputy Collector to acquire sites in the Tanjore District. He acquired land under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act and the plaintiff is one of those persons whoso land has been acquired for house sites for the panchamas. He has brought this suit for a declaration that the acquisition is illegal. Clause (6) of Section (3). of the Land Acquisition Act defines a public purpose as "Including the provision of village sites in districts in which the Local Government shall have declared by Notification in the Official Ga









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top