SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1926 Supreme(Mad) 52

RAMESAM
Lahimiya – Appellant
Versus
Mazur Hannisa – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal arises in the execution of a decree in Order Section No. 316 of 1912 dated 6th January 1915. The decree was obtained by the respondent against her husband, the appellant. The first execution petition was filed on 20th September 1915. The appellants immoveable property was attached. There was a claim petition. It was dismissed on 26th February 1916. The attached property was sold in September 1916 and the sale was confirmed on 10th October 1916, Meanwhile the defeated claimant filed an original suit to establish his right, O. S. No. 420 of 1916. This was dismissed on 9th November 1917. An appeal to the Sub-Court, A. S. No. 55 of 1918, was dismissed on 13th November 1919. The decree-holder then filed a petition for further execution, E. P. No. 44 of. 1920 dated 13th November 1919. She was asked to state how her petition which was more than three years from the earlier petition was not barred. She gave no explanation. She asked for further time. After time was extended twice the following order was passed; "Time can no longer be granted. Rejected". It does not appear on what ground it was rejected. If it was rejected on the ground that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top