RAMESAM
Lahimiya – Appellant
Versus
Mazur Hannisa – Respondent
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal arises in the execution of a decree in Order Section No. 316 of 1912 dated 6th January 1915. The decree was obtained by the respondent against her husband, the appellant. The first execution petition was filed on 20th September 1915. The appellants immoveable property was attached. There was a claim petition. It was dismissed on 26th February 1916. The attached property was sold in September 1916 and the sale was confirmed on 10th October 1916, Meanwhile the defeated claimant filed an original suit to establish his right, O. S. No. 420 of 1916. This was dismissed on 9th November 1917. An appeal to the Sub-Court, A. S. No. 55 of 1918, was dismissed on 13th November 1919. The decree-holder then filed a petition for further execution, E. P. No. 44 of. 1920 dated 13th November 1919. She was asked to state how her petition which was more than three years from the earlier petition was not barred. She gave no explanation. She asked for further time. After time was extended twice the following order was passed; "Time can no longer be granted. Rejected". It does not appear on what ground it was rejected. If it was rejected on the ground that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.