SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1926 Supreme(Mad) 78

In Re: Jogali Bhaigo Naiks – Appellant
Versus
Unknown – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The 1st appellant in this case has been convicted under Sections 114 & 304, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to three years rigororous imprisonment and the 2nd appellant has been convicted under Section 304, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to five years rigorous imprisonment, by the Sessions Judge of Ganjam.

2. The case for the prosecution is that there was a dispute about a plot of land between two castes, the prosecution party called Sioloes and the appellants party called the Bavuries. The accuseds party informed the Magistrate about this and the Magistrate promised to go to the village, make inquiries and pass orders. On the day of the occurrence, the deceased went to the plot in front of the house of Sioloes and planted posts for the purpose of putting up sheds. This was objested to by the appellants party in consequence of which there was a fight.

3. The evidence on the side of the prosecution shows that the deceased was stabbed by the 2nd accused and he was also beaten by three other persons who were acquitted in the lower Court. Apart from the evidence of prosecution witnesses NOs. 2, 5 and 6, who are Sioloes, we have the evidence of P. Ws. Nos. 7 and 8, Brahmins







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top