SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1926 Supreme(Mad) 526

BEASLEY
C. Govindarajulu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary Of State For India In – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Murray Coutts Trotter, Kt., C.J.

1. The plaintiff brings this suit against the Secretary of State for India in Council in the following circumstances;--He made, sales to customers in Salem and Coimbatore of a quantity amounting in all to 100 marcs of gold thread. The gold thread was dispatched to the purchasers from a place called Nellikuppam in South Arcot and in transit it was seized by the Inspector of Customs, Cuddalore Circle, who alleged that the gold thread had been smuggled into British India and had not paid duty. The case for the plaintiff was that he had bought it ultimately through a sub-purchaser from Messrs. Parry & Co., who had imported it from France and paid duty upon it. The Collector of Customs, to whom an appeal lay from the District Officer, or who, rather had to affirm or disaffirm the action of the District Officer, made an order On the 30th July, 1924 whereby he confiscated the goods and ordered their sale. Thereupon there was an appeal to the Governor in Council which was made by the plaintiff and was rejected. He now seeks the assistance of the ordinary Courts of the land to get his goods back or their value, and he has brought this suit which is on


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top