SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1912 Supreme(Mad) 7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MARAS
A Rahim
In Re: Gurusawmi Nadar And Ors.
Versus
Unknown
Decided On : 2 January, 1912

The duty of the Sub-Divisional officer is to protect persons lawfully exercising their rights and restrain persons who threaten to obstruct the exercise of such right.

Headnote:

Section 107 - Breach of Peace - The court found that there was no evidence to show that the accused were likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb public tranquility. The accused were lawfully exercising their right, and it was the duty of the Sub-Divisional officer to protect them and restrain persons who threatened to obstruct their exercise of such right.

Fact of the Case:

The accused were alleged to be likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb public tranquility by insisting on their right to carry palkis through the public street during marriage processions.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was no evidence to support the allegations against the accused. It was noted that the accused were lawfully exercising their right and the duty of the Sub-Divisional officer was to protect them.

Issues: The main issue was whether the accused were likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb public tranquility by exercising their right to carry palkis through the public street during marriage processions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of evidence to support the allegations against the accused and the duty of the Sub-Divisional officer to protect persons lawfully exercising their rights.

Final Decision: The court set aside the order under Section 107, Criminal Procedure Code, and discharged the bonds executed by the accused.

ORDER

Abdur Rahim, J.

1. There is absolutely no warrant for the order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. There is no evidence to show that the accused were likely to commit a breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquility or do any act, which would probably occasion a breach of the peace. All that is found is that on a previous occasion, about a year ago, the Nadars asserted their right to carry palkis through the public street on occasions of marriage, and there was a breach of the peace as some people in the village opposed the Nadars taking palkis in procession on the ground apparently of the Nadars caste which, in their opponents estimation, is not high enough to justify their using palkis during marriage. Nothing particular happened at the time the present proceedings were instituted, except that the marriage season was fast approaching and the police and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate were apprehensive that if the Nadars insisted on their right as before and the other party opposed them there might be a disturbance. It is not even shewn that the accused had any marriages to celebrate in their family, and that they were preparing to carry palkis in procession. All that is alleged against them is that they are leading men of their community. Supposing that some of the Nadars or the accused themselves wanted this year to take palanquins in procession through streets, they would have every right to do so and if any person wanted unlawfully to oppose them in the exercise of such right, it is they that ought to be bound then and not persons who were lawfully exercising or wanted to exercise their ordinary right. It is the duty of the Sub-Divisional officer who is responsible for the peace of his division to use his authority for the protection of persons who seek to exercise a right which the law allows them and to restrain persons who threaten to obstruct the exercise of such right, and for this purpose to enforce, if necessary, the provisions of Section 107, Criminal Procedure Code, not against the former but against the latter. I set aside the order under Section 107, Criminal Procedure Code, and the bonds executed by the accused will be discharged.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top