SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1912 Supreme(Mad) 165

Subramania Aiyar Alias Pichu – Appellant
Versus
M. Subba Naidu Dead And Anantha – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The suit out of which this 2nd appeal has arisen was brought by one Authappa Chetty as trustee of the Kallalagar temple (subject to the supervision of the Madura Vishnu Devasthanam Committee) to recover from the defendant (appellant in this Court) the sum of Rs. 3087-8-6. The plaint alleges that the plaintiff was the lawful trustee of the Devasthanam between March and May 1902 during which period the defendant unlawfully collected moneys due to the Devasthanam for the recovery of which (with interest) the present suit was brought on 28th March 1903.

2. The defendant filed his written statement on 8th May 1908. His contentions (shortly stated were:

(a) that plaintiffs appointment in 1898 was legally invalid and hence be was not entitled as trustee to bring the present suit in 1903.

(b) that plaintiff had been rightly dismissed in April 1901 from his office as trustee and defendant was validly appointed in October 1901 by the temple committee and that defendant was therefore the legal trustee between March and May 1902 when he made the collections for recovery of which the present suit was brought, and

(c) that though defendant had ceased to be trustee in May 1903 when the wri





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top