Sundara Aiyar, J.

1. In this case two charges were preferred against the 1st grade pleader, first that he trafficked jointly with one Marwadi Vannajee in an actionable clai|m put into Court obtained by Yadalla Pichayya and Papayya against the minor heirs of one Virabhadrappa in a suit in which he was plaintiffs vakil; secondly, that he had been and was engaged in trade under the name of K.V.S. Ramchander and Co. The District Judge Mr. B.C. Smith in his report to this Court has found both the charges proved. After full consideration of the evidence on record I concur in the findings arrived at by the District Judge. It is not necessary to do more than to refer very briefly to the evidence in support of the charges.

2. 1st charge. On the 7th September 1909 an agreement was entered into between Pichayya and Papayya the plaintiffs in O.S. No. 3 of 10 on the file of the Subordinate Judges Court of Bellary on the one hand and Vannajee on the other hand for the transfer of the claim of the former in O.S. No. 3 of 1910 which was then pending for a sum of Rs. 4,750. The amount claimed was about Rs. 10,000. The evidence in the suit had been recorded but judgment had not been delivered.