SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1920 Supreme(Mad) 29

In Re: Secretary To The – Appellant
Versus
Unknown – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. After hearing the learned Government Pleader and considering the authorities cited we are of opinion that the three sale-deeds in question, in each of which the vendor mortgages lands not included in the sale as security for the due performance of his covenants, need not be stamped both as sales and mortgages by virtue of the provisions of Section 5 of the Indian Stamp Act 1899, as the sale-deeds are not instruments comprising or relating to distinct matters within the meaning of the section. The decision in Reference by the Board of Revenue (1876) I.L.R. 1 Mad. 133 is not in point, as the terms of Section 14 of Act VIII of 1869 under which it was decided are different from those of Section 5 of the present Act, which was substituted for it in Section 7 of Act I of 1879, which again is practically identical with Section 4 a(1) of the English Stamp Act 1891. In In the matter of a reference Act of under Section 46 of the Stamp Act a decision under Section 7 of the 1879, it was held that an instrument by which a debtor leased certain lands to his creditor and empowered the latter to apply a portion of the annual rent in satisfaction of the debt was both a lease and a usufru

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top