SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1920 Supreme(Mad) 311

J.WALLIS, W.AYLING, S.AIYAR, NAPIER, KRISHNAN
The Secretary To The Board Of – Appellant
Versus
Al. Ar. Rm. Arunachalam Chettiar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

John Wallis, C.J.

1. The only question argued before us was, whether money which became due to a money-lending firm in the course of its business by way of interest in the year of account, or year on the income of which the tax is to be assessed for the current year, is to be treated as part of the assessable income for that year of account, although it was not recovered or realised by the firm in that year either in cash or by adjustment in the accounts. Income is defined in the "Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English," adapted from the great Oxford Dictionary, and published at the Clarendon Press, as "Periodical (usually annual) receipts from ones business, lands, work, investments etc; income tax (levied on this)." This is also the legal acceptation of the term, as appears from Strouds Judicial Dictionary, and numerous definitions, some of which are there cited; while others have been referred to by Mr. K.V. Krishnaswamy in his argument for the petitioners. Lord Salbornes, "income signifies what comes in" is the interest, and, at the same time, sufficiently indicates that the taxation of interest which has not come in is not within the scope of an Income Tax Act. Th



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top