1898 Supreme(Mad) 51
Nittukaruppa Goundan – Appellant
Versus
Kumarasami Goundan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. We think that in this case the words construed by the Sub-Judge as "when yon require" imply a condition as was also decided in a case where the words actually used were "on demand." (S. A 200 of 1897). There the words were not considered as merely technical words, as they were interpreted to be in Perumal Ayyan v. Alagirisami Bhagacathar, I. L. R., 20 M., 245. The Sub-Judge was therefore right in holding the suit was not barred, and this appeal is dismissed with costs.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document